The sustainable development model has five dimensions evaluative: environmental, social, economic, political and cultural. It is a way to manage the complexity, risk and ecological crisis. The formal discourse of sustainability in Brazil, through the National Environmental Policy (PNMA) is guided in matching or evaluative matching this multidimensionality. So do not preach the preponderance of values. However, decision-making practices in advance of the government, have generated unsustainable, especially in the control of the bargain on the issue of pesticides and geneticallymodified seeds. It is that there is a misunderstanding of the discourse of sustainability together with sighted decisions. Scholars of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences argue that “flaws in the speech”, “simplistic models”, “immanence”, “transcendence”, “blindness for the pleasure of the consummation of the task”, are incongruities and inconsistencies of a plastic tree that does not lead the perception of the real tree. This represents an obstacle to find the essence of environmental problems as well as the correct application of the model of sustainable development. In Brazil, legislative decisions, executive and judiciary have hindered the realization of the constitutional obligation under art. 225, § 1º, section V of the Constitution/88 (which requires the government a duty to control harmful substances such as pesticides and transgenic seeds), because despite knowing the existence of the formal discourse of sustainability, adopt decision-making practice by the preponderance a value on the other, demonstrating bad understanding of the developmental model, onedimensionalyzation problems through a myopic management, which ends naturalizing the artificial, i.e., passing the idea that practices sustainable development when using the judgment of preponderance. Therefore, natural forms that represent the qualitative logic “compatibility” and “control” forms give way to value of “preponderance” and “uncontrolled”. This represents a return to risk “hyper development” because not institutionalized environmental management, incorrect application of the model of sustainable development, which in practice is tolerance, in Brazil , the “operating without control”
Real Time Impact Factor:
Pending
Author Name: Marcus Tullius Fernandes dos Santos
URL: View PDF
Keywords: compatibility; decision; preponderance; speech; sustainable development
ISSN: 2526-9488
EISSN:
EOI/DOI: https://doi.org/10.21708/issn2
Add Citation
Views: 1