Reviewing the conclusions of forensic experts is regulated by the procedure
developed by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. The immediate purpose of the
review is to establish the conformity of the study to the approved expert methods, to
draw up an expert opinion on the procedural and departmental requirements. The
ultimate goal of reviewing is to determine whether the conclusion form complies with
the requirements of the law, the scientific validity of the expert opinion as a source of
evidence, and the competence of a forensic expert. External reviewing is carried out
in accordance with the plans of the Ministry of Justice for experts preparing to
receive or confirm their qualifications. Internal peer review is carried out in expert
institutions as ongoing quality control of examinations. Gross violations in expert
studies have been identified, and organizational and procedural consequences are
being drawn, which include sending a court notification about the inaccuracy of the
examination.
Real Time Impact Factor:
Pending
Author Name: M. Shcherbakovskyi
URL: View PDF
Keywords: forensic conclusion, review, written explanation, specialist, interrogation, evidence
ISSN: 0130-2655
EISSN:
EOI/DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/
Add Citation
Views: 1
